The Nepalese Economy

Economics — Grade 12 | Unit 5 | NEB Nepal

---

Introduction

Unit 5 of NEB Grade 12 Economics examines Nepal’s economy in depth — at a more advanced level than the Grade 11 treatment. It covers four interconnected dimensions of Nepal’s development challenge: foreign trade and foreign employment (including remittances), development planning (the history and current state of Nepal’s planning system), the Sustainable Development Goals and Nepal’s progress toward them, and an assessment of Nepal’s contemporary economic condition. These topics move from analysis to policy — examining the real institutions, strategies, and international commitments through which Nepal is attempting to transform its economy and achieve shared prosperity.

---

1. Nepalese Foreign Trade and Foreign Employment

1.1 Concept of Nepal’s Foreign Trade

Foreign trade refers to the exchange of goods and services across national boundaries — exports (goods sent abroad) and imports (goods brought in from abroad). Nepal’s foreign trade is characterized by a large and persistent structural deficit.

According to the Trade and Export Promotion Centre (TEPC) of Nepal, “Nepal’s foreign trade structure reflects the country’s underdeveloped industrial base — a narrow range of primary and semi-processed exports against a broad range of manufactured, petroleum, and consumer goods imports.”

According to Michael Todaro, “For developing countries, foreign trade plays a critical role in development — not only as a source of foreign exchange and market access, but as a channel for technology transfer, knowledge spillovers, and discipline through international competition.”

1.2 Growth of Nepalese Foreign Trade

Nepal’s trade volume has grown substantially over the past three decades — driven by liberalization, regional economic integration, and rising consumer demand fueled by remittances. However, the structural composition has changed little:

Exports: Nepal’s merchandise exports are small — approximately USD 1.5–2 billion annually — and concentrated in a narrow range of products. Key exports include:

• Carpets and rugs (handmade wool carpets — historically Nepal’s largest export earner)
• Pashmina products (shawls, scarves — high value-added product)
• Herbs and essential oils (Timur pepper, wintergreen, kutki)
• Tea and coffee (Ilam district tea; specialty coffees)
• Readymade garments and knitwear
• Handicrafts (thangka paintings, metal crafts, woodwork)
• Electricity (growing — Nepal exported to India since 2021)

Imports: Nepal’s merchandise imports are approximately USD 14–16 billion annually — dominated by:

• Petroleum products (~20–25% of imports): Nepal imports all petroleum from India
• Vehicles and transportation equipment (~10–12%)
• Machinery and equipment (~10%)
• Gold (for domestic use and re-export)
• Chemical fertilizers
• Consumer goods (food, clothing, electronics)

1.3 Composition of Foreign Trade

The composition of Nepal’s trade reveals its structural underdevelopment:

Export composition (approximate shares):

• Primary products (herbs, agricultural produce): ~20%
• Semi-processed goods (carpets, pashmina, tea): ~60%
• Manufactured goods: ~20%

Nepal exports very few fully manufactured goods — reflecting the weakness of its industrial base.

Import composition:

• Fuel and lubricants: ~22%
• Capital goods (machinery, vehicles): ~25%
• Consumer goods: ~30%
• Raw materials and semi-finished goods: ~23%

The high share of consumer goods imports reflects the remittance-financed consumption boom. High capital goods imports reflect investment needs but also create future debt service obligations.

1.4 Direction of Foreign Trade

Nepal’s trade is heavily concentrated geographically — particularly in its relationship with India:

Exports by destination (approximate):

• India: ~65–70% of total merchandise exports
• USA: ~8–10% (mostly carpets and pashmina)
• Germany: ~5%
• China and other countries: remainder

Imports by source (approximate):

• India: ~60–65% of total merchandise imports
• China: ~15–18%
• Other countries: remainder

Nepal’s overwhelming trade dependence on India reflects geographic reality (shared open border, free trade agreement, currency peg) but also represents a structural vulnerability — any disruption to India-Nepal trade relations significantly affects Nepal’s economy.

1.5 Problems of Nepal’s Foreign Trade

i. Narrow export base: Nepal exports a few primary and semi-processed products — carpets, pashmina, herbs — with limited capacity to expand or diversify quickly.

ii. Low value addition: Most Nepali exports are raw or minimally processed — selling raw herbs rather than pharmaceutical extracts; raw wool rather than finished garments. This means Nepal captures only a small fraction of the final value.

iii. Trade deficit: Nepal’s chronic and large trade deficit (imports approximately 7–10× exports by value) requires financing through remittances, foreign aid, and loans — creating structural vulnerability.

iv. Landlocked geography: Nepal must route all sea-borne trade through Indian ports (Kolkata/Haldia) — adding logistics costs, transit delays, and dependence on India’s port infrastructure.

v. Limited transport infrastructure: Poor road and rail connectivity — particularly to border trade points — increases the cost of moving goods to and from Nepal.

vi. Non-tariff barriers: Nepal’s exporters face quality standards, certification requirements, and administrative procedures in export markets that are difficult to meet.

vii. Dependence on India: Excessive geographic concentration of trade creates vulnerability to trade disputes, border closures, and economic conditions in India.

viii. Low competitiveness: High production costs (electricity, logistics, labour regulations), small scale, and limited technology adoption make Nepali manufactured goods uncompetitive against Indian and Chinese imports.

1.6 Foreign Employment in Nepal

Foreign employment — the practice of Nepali citizens working abroad, primarily in India, Gulf countries, Malaysia, and Korea — has become one of the defining features of Nepal’s economy.

According to Nepal Rastra Bank, approximately 3.5–4 million Nepalis are engaged in foreign employment — the majority between 20 and 40 years of age. Foreign employment generates annual remittances of approximately USD 9–10 billion — equivalent to 25–27% of GDP.

Destination countries:

• India: Largest destination — estimated 2–3 million Nepali workers (open border, no documentation required)
• Gulf countries (Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain): Second largest group — approximately 500,000–700,000 workers (construction, domestic service, hospitality)
• Malaysia: Approximately 150,000–200,000 (manufacturing, construction, plantation)
• Korea: Approximately 30,000–40,000 (manufacturing — accessed through EPS-KLT test)
• Japan: Growing destination under new visa programs

Benefits of foreign employment:

i. Remittances and poverty reduction: The most significant economic benefit. Nepal’s poverty rate has fallen from 42% to approximately 17–20% — largely attributed to remittance income raising household consumption and investment.

ii. Skills and technology transfer: Workers returning from foreign employment bring technical skills, language capabilities, and exposure to modern work practices.

iii. Reduced domestic unemployment pressure: Foreign employment absorbs approximately 400,000 additional labour force entrants per year — relieving pressure on Nepal’s insufficient domestic job market.

iv. Foreign exchange earnings: Remittances are Nepal’s largest source of foreign exchange — financing the import-heavy current account.

Problems of foreign employment:

i. Brain drain: Nepal loses educated and skilled workers — doctors, engineers, IT professionals — to foreign employment and emigration. This depletes the human capital needed for domestic development.

ii. Social costs: Family separation — particularly fathers working abroad for years while children are raised by mothers alone — has well-documented social and psychological impacts. Child development, educational outcomes, and marital stability all suffer.

iii. Vulnerability and exploitation: Nepali workers abroad — particularly in Gulf countries and Malaysia — face risks of contract substitution, wage theft, unsafe working conditions, passport confiscation, and trafficking.

iv. Structural dependence: Nepal’s economy has become structurally dependent on remittances to finance consumption and government revenue — crowding out domestic investment and industrial development.

v. Dutch disease risk: Large remittance inflows can cause exchange rate appreciation that makes Nepali exports uncompetitive — the “Dutch disease” phenomenon. While Nepal’s fixed exchange rate with India partially insulates against this, it does not eliminate the risk.

vi. Remittances channelled to consumption: A large share of remittances finances consumption (housing, education, healthcare, consumer goods) rather than productive investment — limiting the growth multiplier of remittance income.

---

2. Development Planning in Nepal

2.1 Concept of Development Planning

Development planning is the systematic process by which a government sets explicit economic and social goals, allocates public resources to achieve them, and monitors progress — typically through multi-year plans.

According to W. Arthur Lewis, “Development planning is the deliberate use of state power to direct and accelerate economic growth — particularly investment in infrastructure, human capital, and strategic industries that the market alone would under-provide.”

According to Jan Tinbergen, the first Nobel laureate in economics, “Economic planning involves the application of a consistent set of techniques to the formulation of economic policy — ensuring that the various components of development strategy are internally consistent and mutually reinforcing.”

According to Albert Waterston, “Development planning is the conscious effort by a government to allocate available resources for various sectors of the economy in a manner that will achieve the objectives set out in the plan.”

2.2 Brief History of Nepal’s Development Planning

Nepal’s planned development began with the First Five-Year Plan (2013–2017 BS / 1956–1961 AD) — a landmark in Nepal’s modern history, marking the first systematic attempt to direct public resources toward economic development.

Planning history:

Plan	Period (BS)	Period (AD)	Key Focus
First Five-Year Plan	2013–17	1956–61	Basic infrastructure, agriculture
Second Five-Year Plan	2019–23	1962–65	Industry, hydropower, roads
Third Five-Year Plan	2023–27	1965–70	Rural development, social services
Fourth Five-Year Plan	2027–31	1970–75	Agriculture, decentralization
Fifth Five-Year Plan	2031–35	1975–80	Poverty alleviation, rural development
Sixth Five-Year Plan	2037–41	1980–85	Rural development, decentralization
Seventh Five-Year Plan	2041–46	1985–90	Production, employment, social justice
Eighth Five-Year Plan	2049–54	1992–97	Economic liberalization, private sector
Ninth Five-Year Plan	2054–59	1997–02	Poverty reduction (first explicit priority)
Tenth Five-Year Plan	2059–63	2002–07	Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)
Three-Year Interim Plan	2064–67	2007–10	Post-conflict reconstruction
Three-Year Plan	2067–70	2010–13	Infrastructure, social development
Three-Year Plan	2070–73	2013–16	Employment, agriculture, infrastructure
Fourteenth Plan	2073–76	2016–19	Sustainable development, federalism
Fifteenth Plan	2076–80	2019–24	LDC graduation, prosperity
Sixteenth Plan	2081–85	2024–29	Economic transformation, SDGs

2.3 Current Plan (16th Plan: 2081/82–2085/86 BS)

Nepal’s Sixteenth Plan (2081–2085 BS / 2024–2029 AD) is the current national development plan, formulated by the National Planning Commission (NPC) under the Prime Minister’s chairmanship.

Vision: “A Prosperous Nepal, Happy Nepali”

Major objectives of the 16th Plan:

i. Economic growth: Achieve GDP growth of at least 7.2% annually — accelerating from the recent 4–5% trend to create a structural improvement in the growth rate.

ii. Poverty reduction: Reduce the poverty rate to below 10% by the end of the plan period.

iii. LDC graduation: Complete Nepal’s transition out of the Least Developed Country category — which has been deferred due to COVID-19 impacts.

iv. SDG achievement: Accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals in all 17 dimensions.

v. Financial inclusion: Expand access to formal financial services to reach 95% of the adult population.

vi. Employment: Create 500,000 new jobs annually — sufficient to absorb new labour force entrants and reduce foreign employment dependence.

vii. Infrastructure: Complete strategic road network expansion, accelerate hydropower development, and expand digital connectivity.

Priority sectors identified in the 16th Plan:

• Hydropower and energy (develop 10,000 MW installed capacity by 2029)
• Tourism (reach 2 million annual international arrivals)
• Agriculture modernization and commercialization
• Manufacturing and export promotion
• Digital economy and financial technology

2.4 Formulation Process of Nepal’s Development Plan

Step 1 — Policy direction: The government cabinet defines the broad policy direction and priorities for the plan — informed by political commitments, SDG obligations, and economic analysis.

Step 2 — Situation analysis: NPC commissions comprehensive reviews of the current economic situation — sectoral assessments, poverty analysis, infrastructure status, and international comparisons.

Step 3 — Stakeholder consultation: Consultations with line ministries, provincial and local governments, private sector, civil society, and development partners — to incorporate diverse perspectives and ensure ownership.

Step 4 — Technical formulation: NPC economists and sector specialists formulate the plan — setting targets, determining resource requirements, and designing strategies for each sector and cross-cutting theme.

Step 5 — Macro framework: A macroeconomic framework is developed — projecting GDP growth, investment requirements, savings, inflation, and balance of payments over the plan period.

Step 6 — Resource mobilization plan: Identifying how the required investment will be financed — domestic revenue, foreign aid, foreign loans, private investment, and public-private partnerships.

Step 7 — Cabinet approval and publication: The completed plan is approved by the cabinet and published — becoming the official development framework for the plan period.

Step 8 — Annual budget alignment: Each year’s national budget is designed to operationalize the plan — allocating resources to plan priorities through the budget process.

Step 9 — Monitoring and evaluation: Progress against plan targets is monitored annually — through NPC’s annual progress reviews, sectoral performance assessments, and mid-term evaluations.

2.5 Evaluation of Nepal’s Development Planning

Achievements:

• Poverty reduction from 42% (1996) to approximately 17–20% (2023)
• Human development improvement — life expectancy from 54 to 72 years
• Road network expansion — from virtually no roads in 1950 to 30,000+ km today
• Hydropower development — installed capacity from near-zero to approximately 2,800 MW
• Universal primary education — net enrolment above 95%

Persistent challenges:

• Low plan implementation rate: Capital expenditure consistently falls short of budget targets — often only 60–70% of allocated development funds are spent
• Political instability: Frequent government changes (10 governments in 10 years, 2008–2018) disrupt planning continuity
• Centralization legacy: Despite federalism, many development functions remain centralized, limiting local government effectiveness
• Aid dependence: A substantial share of the capital budget depends on foreign aid and loans — making Nepal’s development vulnerable to aid volatility
• Private sector constraints: Inadequate infrastructure, regulatory complexity, and financing limitations have prevented private sector from assuming the development role envisaged in recent plans

---

3. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Nepal

3.1 Concept of Sustainable Development

According to the Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987), “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

According to Jeffrey Sachs, special adviser to the UN Secretary-General on the SDGs, “Sustainable development is a framework for thinking about development that integrates economic development, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability — recognizing that these three dimensions are inseparable and mutually reinforcing.”

3.2 The 17 Sustainable Development Goals

The SDGs were adopted by all 193 UN member states — including Nepal — at the UN Sustainable Development Summit in September 2015. They replaced the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and set a comprehensive 2030 Agenda for global development.

The 17 SDGs:

Goal	Title
SDG 1	No Poverty
SDG 2	Zero Hunger
SDG 3	Good Health and Well-Being
SDG 4	Quality Education
SDG 5	Gender Equality
SDG 6	Clean Water and Sanitation
SDG 7	Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 8	Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9	Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
SDG 10	Reduced Inequalities
SDG 11	Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 12	Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 13	Climate Action
SDG 14	Life Below Water
SDG 15	Life on Land
SDG 16	Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
SDG 17	Partnerships for the Goals

3.3 Nepal’s Progress on Priority SDGs

Nepal has integrated the SDGs into its national planning framework — particularly the 15th and 16th Plans. Nepal’s Voluntary National Review (VNR) reports to the UN High-Level Political Forum provide regular assessments of progress.

SDG 1 — No Poverty: Nepal has made strong progress — poverty rate reduced from 42% to approximately 17–20%. However, multidimensional poverty remains high, and regional disparities are significant. The 16th Plan targets poverty below 10% by 2029.

SDG 2 — Zero Hunger: Nepal’s food security situation has improved — stunting rates among children under 5 have fallen from approximately 57% (2001) to approximately 32% (2022). However, food insecurity in mountain and remote districts remains severe.

SDG 3 — Good Health and Well-Being: Strong improvements: maternal mortality reduced from 900+ to approximately 151 per 100,000 live births; infant mortality from 170 to approximately 24 per 1,000 live births; life expectancy from 54 to 72 years. Universal health insurance program under development.

SDG 4 — Quality Education: High enrolment achieved (net primary enrolment >95%). Quality remains a challenge — learning outcomes in government schools are poor; teacher absenteeism is common; gender gaps persist in secondary and tertiary education.

SDG 5 — Gender Equality: Nepal has made institutional progress — the constitution requires 33% women’s representation in all elected bodies, and women’s political representation is among the highest in South Asia. However, gender-based violence, unequal inheritance rights, and low female labour force participation remain significant challenges.

SDG 7 — Affordable and Clean Energy: Nepal has expanded electricity access dramatically — from approximately 30% of households in 2000 to approximately 95% in 2023. The ongoing hydropower development program will further expand clean energy production. Cooking energy transition (from biomass to LPG and electricity) is advancing but incomplete.

SDG 8 — Decent Work and Economic Growth: Nepal’s GDP growth has been insufficient (4–5% versus the 7%+ needed), formal employment generation is inadequate, and labour rights in the informal economy and foreign employment contexts are poorly protected.

SDG 13 — Climate Action: Nepal is among the world’s most climate-vulnerable nations — experiencing accelerating glacier retreat, increased frequency of extreme weather events, and changes in monsoon patterns. Nepal has submitted its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement, committing to reach net-zero emissions by 2045 and to achieve 15,000 MW of renewable energy by 2030.

3.4 Challenges in Achieving SDGs in Nepal

i. Financing gap: The SDGs require massive investment — Nepal’s National Planning Commission estimates the SDG financing gap at several times Nepal’s annual government budget. Domestic revenue, aid, and private investment together are insufficient.

ii. Data gaps: Monitoring SDG progress requires comprehensive and disaggregated data — but Nepal’s statistical system has significant gaps, particularly for remote areas and marginalized groups.

iii. Implementation capacity: Many SDG targets require institutional capacity — trained officials, effective service delivery systems, functioning local governments — that Nepal is still building.

iv. Climate vulnerability: Nepal’s climate vulnerability threatens to reverse hard-won development gains — through crop failures, infrastructure damage, displacement, and health impacts.

v. Political commitment and continuity: Sustained SDG progress requires political commitment across multiple government terms — challenging in Nepal’s history of frequent political transitions.

---

4. The Nepalese Economy in Review

4.1 Contemporary Features and Macroeconomic Indicators

Nepal’s economy in the mid-2020s exhibits the following key structural features:

Growth and structure:

• GDP: approximately NPR 5.2 trillion (USD ~40 billion)
• GDP per capita: approximately USD 1,300–1,400
• Growth rate: 4–5% (below the 7%+ needed for structural transformation)
• Services: approximately 58–60% of GDP
• Agriculture: approximately 25–28% of GDP (but 60% of employment)
• Industry: approximately 12–15% of GDP

Remittance economy:

• Remittances: approximately 25–27% of GDP
• Foreign workers: approximately 3.5–4 million
• Remittance growth has been the primary driver of poverty reduction and household welfare improvement

Trade and payments:

• Trade deficit: approximately USD 12–15 billion annually
• Current account: fluctuates between deficit and small surplus depending on remittance flows
• Foreign exchange reserves: approximately equivalent to 7–9 months of imports

Financial sector:

• 27 commercial banks, development banks, finance companies, and thousands of cooperatives
• Banking sector assets: approximately 100% of GDP
• Non-performing loans (NPLs): a concern after the 2022–23 economic slowdown

Fiscal position:

• Tax-to-GDP: approximately 22–24%
• Budget deficit: approximately 3–5% of GDP
• External debt: approximately 25–30% of GDP

4.2 Key Economic Challenges

i. Structural transformation: Nepal must shift from subsistence agriculture to modern services, industry, and high-value agriculture — the classic structural transformation that development requires.

ii. Investment and savings: Nepal’s gross capital formation (investment) is approximately 25–28% of GDP — financed partly by remittances but insufficient for rapid growth. The savings-investment gap requires foreign capital.

iii. Hydropower development: Nepal’s single most important economic opportunity — developing even a fraction of its 42,000 MW feasible hydropower potential could transform Nepal from an energy-importing country into a major regional electricity exporter, generating billions in export revenue and enabling cheap industrial power.

iv. Tourism recovery and expansion: Nepal’s tourism sector — devastated by the 2015 earthquake and COVID-19 — has recovered but has not yet reached its potential. Expanding tourism beyond Kathmandu, Pokhara, and the established trekking routes to new destinations and tourism products could significantly increase revenue and employment.

v. Federalism implementation: Nepal’s 2072 BS Constitution established a federal structure with 7 provinces and 753 local governments. Implementing functional federalism — with effective local government delivery of services — requires capacity building, revenue sharing, and institutional development that is still in progress.

vi. Climate resilience: Nepal must mainstream climate adaptation into all development sectors — building infrastructure that withstands extreme weather, adapting agriculture to changing rainfall patterns, and managing glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) risks.

---

Conclusion

The Nepalese economy is at a critical juncture — having achieved remarkable progress in poverty reduction and human development over the past three decades, while still facing profound structural challenges in industrialization, employment generation, trade diversification, and institutional development. The concepts and frameworks in Unit 5 — foreign trade analysis, development planning, SDG monitoring, and macroeconomic review — provide the analytical tools for understanding where Nepal is, how it got here, and what it needs to do next.

As Michael Todaro observed, “Development ultimately must come from within — it cannot be imported or imposed from outside. The determinants of success are largely internal: the quality of institutions, the commitment of leadership, the capabilities of the population, and the wisdom of economic policy.” For Nepal’s Grade 12 economics students — the next generation of citizens, entrepreneurs, and policymakers — understanding these internal determinants is the essential preparation for the roles they will play in shaping Nepal’s economic future.

---

Prepared for NEB Grade 12 Economics — Unit 5: The Nepalese Economy Aligned with the National Curriculum Framework 2076, Curriculum Development Centre, Sanothimi, Bhaktapur